Thank you. I live in the Netherlands myself. Zero 'vaccinations' by the way.
I am 100% convinced that these so called vaccines do more harm than good. All the evidence points that way. Probably no need to convince anyone in this thread:-)
I am pleased to see so many people working with the data. But.... I am a bit confused. Here's why:
The website of the CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) which published this data mentions the following: Until this publication they considered people as 'vaccinated' 2 weeks after the second jab (Pfizer and Moderna mRNA jabs). They changed this definition and according to their website now consider people as vaccinated immediately after the second jab.
That means, people who die with one jab only are considered 'unvaccinated'. But when i look in the CSV link that you provide I see a description 'immediately after first dose' which seems to imply that they did count the single jabbers.
Have the CBS accidently shown more data than they had planned to share? I am a bit confused since I now see so many graphs and stats. For me it only makes sense when I undetstand the underlying data.
"Thus, likely given no efficacy, but proven harm, the entire rollout should have never taken place."
That is exactly what appears to be seen in New Zealand. Vaxx/never vaxx hospital deaths appear to be similar pro rata, while the proportion of vaxxed filling the hospitals escalated as numbers as the number in the population were shotted. A mess of confounding, but death in hospital reveals the absence of any utility of the shots. https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/new-zealand-moh-data
Dear Ben, I think it's quite simple. We are seeing the consequence of something we already know. A simultaneous decrease in vaccinated people along with their decreasing average age. This is why green generally dies less than red and with less seasonality over time. God bless the Netherlands, even if they have occasionally annoyed us in soccer. :-)
In your "All-cause Mortality by Vaccination Status" graphs, "Deaths per 100k population by vaccination status":
A) is that relative to respective populations (i.e. Vax Deaths per 100k Vax people) or
B) is that relative to combined populations (i.e. Vax Deaths per 100k ALL people), which is naturally higher for vax than non-vax, simply because there are more vaxed than non-vaxed ?
Can you please make this clear and bold in your article.
If the age standardised mortality rate is showing a signal then is showing age standardised mortality rates by vaccination status going to help pin point at least where it may or may not be? Can that be obtained from that data?
When enough people figure out gov/MSM/big-tech/pharma/medicine killed their loved ones and soon them, what do you think that looks like on a global scale? I bet global martial law is coming if only to off-set the inevitable explosion of revenge-rage.
The real sudden death numbers can be seen through supply and demand stats: IE global shipment of smart phones is down 4% annually (hundreds of millions), or the huge drop in telecom subscribers across all providers, or the huge decline in movie streaming subscribers. When you look at the "suddenly unsubscribed" numbers and then look at OpenVaers ratio of dead to injured ratio and factor in the same ratio to "suddenly unsubscribed", we get closer to 600 million dead and injured, globally. it's hard to see with mass migration, but the numbers don't lie and they should be numbers with annual growth.
Factoring in the declining birth rate, it's about a 2.8% annual loss of global population that will probably add up to billions of deaths over the next 10 years. Can't research real numbers on Google, but you can on Yandex.com
Deagel population forecasts nearly 70% percent fewer Americans by 2025 From Deagel . com before they scrubbed it
The COVID Blog estimates that the global population dropped from 7.8 billion in January 2020 to approximately 6.8 billion today – about a 13% drop in 28 months.
Thank you. I live in the Netherlands myself. Zero 'vaccinations' by the way.
I am 100% convinced that these so called vaccines do more harm than good. All the evidence points that way. Probably no need to convince anyone in this thread:-)
I am pleased to see so many people working with the data. But.... I am a bit confused. Here's why:
The website of the CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) which published this data mentions the following: Until this publication they considered people as 'vaccinated' 2 weeks after the second jab (Pfizer and Moderna mRNA jabs). They changed this definition and according to their website now consider people as vaccinated immediately after the second jab.
That means, people who die with one jab only are considered 'unvaccinated'. But when i look in the CSV link that you provide I see a description 'immediately after first dose' which seems to imply that they did count the single jabbers.
Have the CBS accidently shown more data than they had planned to share? I am a bit confused since I now see so many graphs and stats. For me it only makes sense when I undetstand the underlying data.
"Thus, likely given no efficacy, but proven harm, the entire rollout should have never taken place."
That is exactly what appears to be seen in New Zealand. Vaxx/never vaxx hospital deaths appear to be similar pro rata, while the proportion of vaxxed filling the hospitals escalated as numbers as the number in the population were shotted. A mess of confounding, but death in hospital reveals the absence of any utility of the shots. https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/new-zealand-moh-data
Dear Ben, I think it's quite simple. We are seeing the consequence of something we already know. A simultaneous decrease in vaccinated people along with their decreasing average age. This is why green generally dies less than red and with less seasonality over time. God bless the Netherlands, even if they have occasionally annoyed us in soccer. :-)
Much appreciated your work.
Most important technical question however:
In your "All-cause Mortality by Vaccination Status" graphs, "Deaths per 100k population by vaccination status":
A) is that relative to respective populations (i.e. Vax Deaths per 100k Vax people) or
B) is that relative to combined populations (i.e. Vax Deaths per 100k ALL people), which is naturally higher for vax than non-vax, simply because there are more vaxed than non-vaxed ?
Can you please make this clear and bold in your article.
Regards
(from designer of Canada Vital Statistics (Deaths) Tracker - https://o-canada.shinyapps.io/vitals)
Whole point of the exercise.
If the age standardised mortality rate is showing a signal then is showing age standardised mortality rates by vaccination status going to help pin point at least where it may or may not be? Can that be obtained from that data?
None of these figures makes any sense unless you also show the total population in each of the two groups.
When enough people figure out gov/MSM/big-tech/pharma/medicine killed their loved ones and soon them, what do you think that looks like on a global scale? I bet global martial law is coming if only to off-set the inevitable explosion of revenge-rage.
The real sudden death numbers can be seen through supply and demand stats: IE global shipment of smart phones is down 4% annually (hundreds of millions), or the huge drop in telecom subscribers across all providers, or the huge decline in movie streaming subscribers. When you look at the "suddenly unsubscribed" numbers and then look at OpenVaers ratio of dead to injured ratio and factor in the same ratio to "suddenly unsubscribed", we get closer to 600 million dead and injured, globally. it's hard to see with mass migration, but the numbers don't lie and they should be numbers with annual growth.
Factoring in the declining birth rate, it's about a 2.8% annual loss of global population that will probably add up to billions of deaths over the next 10 years. Can't research real numbers on Google, but you can on Yandex.com
Deagel population forecasts nearly 70% percent fewer Americans by 2025 From Deagel . com before they scrubbed it
Deagel's 2025 Forecast by Country PDF
https://nobulart.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Deagel-2025-Forecast-by-Country.pdf
The COVID Blog estimates that the global population dropped from 7.8 billion in January 2020 to approximately 6.8 billion today – about a 13% drop in 28 months.