No statistical significant effect on all-cause mortality by COVID-19 vaccination status. Higher Rates observed in COVID-19 vaccinated during COVID-19 attributed excess mortality periods.
Denis Rancourt and colleagues have shown that there never was a pandemic or any kind of public health emergency.
Several groups have explained that massed testing using PCR-based diagnostics are invalid measures & are props to a deception.
Given the foregoing, no “countermeasures” were ever appropriate. Not lockdown, not masks, not business closures, not border restrictions, not mass testing of the population whether sick or well, not massed injections.
As a long time former big pharma & biotech research executive, I understand the drug design process more than adequately. Not one atom or compound is in a finished product without having been chosen to be there & there’s always a rationale for inclusion. Looking at the design of these injections masquerading as vaccines against a non-existent health threat, I can discern several, independent mechanisms of toxicity and others have found others.
Bottom line, someone applied effort and industry knowledge to build these substances with the intention of causing harm, some of which inevitably would lead to deaths. Additionally, there are features built into at least the mRNA-based products designed to reduce fertility in survivors.
Unfortunately, where we can see the epidemiological evidence, we find injuries and deaths following injections, by several modes of toxicity.
I don’t understand how anyone can conclude other than a long planned attack upon humanity is underway, nor that there can be any other expectation than that there’ll be further attacks.
I have not observed any of the institutions designed to protect the people from harm actually doing their jobs, implying they have all been captured.
Thus, no one is coming to save us.
We can save ourselves and those who are prepared to plan to not be immediately vulnerable to whatever crisis is next visited upon us.
I think our best hope of survival as a free species is to refuse to comply with the next set of instructions. The worse the threatened sanctions for non compliance, I submit the more important it is to resist.
People were considered unvaccinated until a few weeks after their vaccination which is the most likely time someone dies from a vaccine. My uncle died within 48 hours of vaccination but will be in the records as an unvaccinated death. The jab has caused widespread harm in the vaccinated and hospitals are full of them. The hdc were warning people a few weeks back of delays as so many staff off sick in summer. Schools have had to send kids home as too many teachers off sick getting covid.
Many of the vaccinated are getting sick every 6 months. For them the pandemic is still happening and Michael baker says it’s not over
The thing is there is a high amount of excess deaths but it all depends on how the person doing the math calculates it. It’s pointless only looking at statistics from 2020 onwards without looking back. It’s the excess deaths. It’s the reports from funeral directors and those of embalmers that are the reality
Denis Rancourt has also found high excess deaths in the vaccinated in the entire southern hemisphere and his research matches with the reality on the ground.
Curious to know if vaccination status as defined by the NZ Ministry of Health adheres to the CDC definition. I'm guessing that it does. And if that's the case, the ACM for "unvaccinated" is most likely inverted or at least seriously distorted.
Nice work Ben and I'll thank my numbers main man Joel "Metatron" Smalley for pointing me to your stack.😉😊
After 4 years of this BS statistical shell game, I frankly don't give a flying fig anymore about their quantitative 14 day definition of what denotes "vaccination status. It's a performative, statistical hand job, masquerading as "science". An insult to science, humanity, to Archimedes, a and anyone else that really understands numbers.😤🤐🤦♀️
I'm wanting hard numerical data on the 5mth-18mth gap between when the shots were initially given, to when someone "dies suddenly". The pattern is there anecdotally. It's there in the numbers. If we don't match the pattern with real world data, then millions of people will never be given justice. They will never be acknowledged as being part of a militarized, iatrogenic democide, as it will come to be known as. They will be written of as "tragically died young" due to one of the myriad of shot induced side effects that already happen to be diagnosed. Turbo cancers, prion disorders, suicides, car accidents, strokes, ad nauseam.😤😭🤐
Those that died within 56 days of receiving the shot, will be ultimately acknowledged as being "tragic victims of a terrible mistake". But that number of people, is no where near the terrible and horrifying number still to be calculated as the ultimate mortality rate.😐😐🤔😭😤😤🤦♀️
Thanks for doing these, we have an official inquiry coming up, the new deputy PM we voted in is on our side, but we need to get rid of the inquiry commissioners appointed by Ardern. These analysis would be helpful
Of note, yes like <20 died with covid in 2021, injection to the public started in July, ramped up to high gear from September, using a dead Polynesian man and family, had a Super Saturday event in early October, mandates 15th November, vax passport kicked in December, and healthcare workers and teachers were forced to take boosters before February. Freedom occupation and protest started in Feb and ended by govt violently in early March, where unvaxed did most of mass gathering while vaxed deaths were doing the spiking
Funny how unvaccinated were dying during the vax rollout, when covid only took less than 20, others have pointed out the vax status delays, wink wink
The lab leak hoax is another distraction, the only way to create a worldwide pandemic is to clone lots and lots of virus and spread it all over the place.
Any significant difference between the NZ dataset and the historical recorded rates is a big red flag.
Even appearing in the ONS dataset provided immortality benefit to those individuals in the dataset. Hence thousands of deaths were missing.
(you cite an old article of ours, on an old blog, attributed solely to Norman which analysed reporting delay. We switched to miscategorisation as the most likely explanation. We revealed dozens of studies worldwide that relied on this 'cheap trick'.
The efficacy level is a statistical illusion manufactured by deploying the cheap trick. Even a negative efficacy vaccine (that gives you covid) would not only meet but would exceed the WHO 50% threshold.
This is interesting. Thanks for doing this but admittedly I'm troubled. I'm only coming from a layman's perspective but the phrase "no significant difference" seems to explain away massive deaths from the Covid-19 vaccines. Looking at the initial graph, it seems about 45 extra people per 100,000 died in that 15 month period post 2021 - not a lot but raising it to the population vaccinated size of New Zealand (let's say 80%) of a 5 million populace or so, that yields 1,800 deaths.
Now with 45 per 100,000 being insignificant, let's apply this insignificance to the UK (again let's just say 80% vaxxed). With a population of 67 million, there's now a real problem. The problem is 24,120 extra deaths. No significant difference?
And the USA at 332 million population? We now have 119,520 deaths resulting from that small difference starting at 45 per 100,000.
If a gas explosion wiped out a small city and Joe Biden rocked up and said, don't, worry, it's not significant, we have 20,000 settlements in the US, that's only 6 people extra dying per settlement, it's not a problem, I think there would be a problem!
I'm not actually a maths guy tbh, so there's a chance I've made a dreadfully embarrassing mistake and perhaps my working is not perfect but there seems to be big trouble with this phrase from my perspective. Please tell me where I am going wrong?
As someone said to me if you are in a resthome it was probably mandatory to get the vaxx. I had a couple of looks at the NZ data myself and my analysis definitely indicated a higher death rate over 60.
Death notices in the NZ Herald (goes against the narrative of more deaths a little)
Yes, the issues in curating interpolation methodology subreferencing age-stratified disaggregation interpolation v age-standardized age/vaccination datasets... ‘Tis a bother innit.
It would help if our nz min health here were honest & data not fraudulent- & then they wouldnt have to go after barry young would they.
I prefer to trust my eyeballs out here in the real world, & here in nz two boyhood mates- infinitely fitter & healthier than moi- snuffed it to rapid cancers post vax, not seeing 65. We all have many such stories.
“Covid?” Sorry mate, you’ll have to explain that one.
My family didnt get vaxed, never masked or locked down- instead cheek by jowl with tens thousands other un-jabbed freedom fighters at rallies from auckland to wellington
... & never had your “covid.”
& all those we know got vaxed get “covid” every other week. A constant talking point for them.
Add philip buckler’s 714 page ‘book on masks’ to yr reading lists. Even more refs confirming masking ails mis-diagnosed as “covid” or “long covid.”
I have read enough OIA’s to know everything coming from our govt is fake. “Data manipulation” too tame a phrase. Same issue here as poms with their ONS.
Dear Ben, thanks for your great work with numerous interesting findings. I notice that in the cumulative mortality graph, the differences increase during winter in the southern hemisphere (~ July). Because of the strong age dependence of the seasonal waves, this is most likely related to age differences in the vaccination rate. Aggregations over 10-20 year age cohorts probably do not resolve this accurately enough, because mortality is exponentially age-dependent (above 30 years of age), while vax quote is not.
You can at least partially solve this with an interpolation using the base points available from the data (I do this in my estimation of weekly life expectancies from rough age cohorts, and it works quite well).
It is possible that the difference would then disappear completely.
Denis Rancourt and colleagues have shown that there never was a pandemic or any kind of public health emergency.
Several groups have explained that massed testing using PCR-based diagnostics are invalid measures & are props to a deception.
Given the foregoing, no “countermeasures” were ever appropriate. Not lockdown, not masks, not business closures, not border restrictions, not mass testing of the population whether sick or well, not massed injections.
As a long time former big pharma & biotech research executive, I understand the drug design process more than adequately. Not one atom or compound is in a finished product without having been chosen to be there & there’s always a rationale for inclusion. Looking at the design of these injections masquerading as vaccines against a non-existent health threat, I can discern several, independent mechanisms of toxicity and others have found others.
Bottom line, someone applied effort and industry knowledge to build these substances with the intention of causing harm, some of which inevitably would lead to deaths. Additionally, there are features built into at least the mRNA-based products designed to reduce fertility in survivors.
Unfortunately, where we can see the epidemiological evidence, we find injuries and deaths following injections, by several modes of toxicity.
I don’t understand how anyone can conclude other than a long planned attack upon humanity is underway, nor that there can be any other expectation than that there’ll be further attacks.
I have not observed any of the institutions designed to protect the people from harm actually doing their jobs, implying they have all been captured.
Thus, no one is coming to save us.
We can save ourselves and those who are prepared to plan to not be immediately vulnerable to whatever crisis is next visited upon us.
I think our best hope of survival as a free species is to refuse to comply with the next set of instructions. The worse the threatened sanctions for non compliance, I submit the more important it is to resist.
People were considered unvaccinated until a few weeks after their vaccination which is the most likely time someone dies from a vaccine. My uncle died within 48 hours of vaccination but will be in the records as an unvaccinated death. The jab has caused widespread harm in the vaccinated and hospitals are full of them. The hdc were warning people a few weeks back of delays as so many staff off sick in summer. Schools have had to send kids home as too many teachers off sick getting covid.
Many of the vaccinated are getting sick every 6 months. For them the pandemic is still happening and Michael baker says it’s not over
The thing is there is a high amount of excess deaths but it all depends on how the person doing the math calculates it. It’s pointless only looking at statistics from 2020 onwards without looking back. It’s the excess deaths. It’s the reports from funeral directors and those of embalmers that are the reality
Denis Rancourt has also found high excess deaths in the vaccinated in the entire southern hemisphere and his research matches with the reality on the ground.
Articles like this take a lot of time, patience, and work. Thanks Ben! I appreciate it.
Thanks for the great work, but I don't trust government data. The same people who have been lying for the last 3 years are likely lying now.
Curious to know if vaccination status as defined by the NZ Ministry of Health adheres to the CDC definition. I'm guessing that it does. And if that's the case, the ACM for "unvaccinated" is most likely inverted or at least seriously distorted.
Nice work Ben and I'll thank my numbers main man Joel "Metatron" Smalley for pointing me to your stack.😉😊
After 4 years of this BS statistical shell game, I frankly don't give a flying fig anymore about their quantitative 14 day definition of what denotes "vaccination status. It's a performative, statistical hand job, masquerading as "science". An insult to science, humanity, to Archimedes, a and anyone else that really understands numbers.😤🤐🤦♀️
I'm wanting hard numerical data on the 5mth-18mth gap between when the shots were initially given, to when someone "dies suddenly". The pattern is there anecdotally. It's there in the numbers. If we don't match the pattern with real world data, then millions of people will never be given justice. They will never be acknowledged as being part of a militarized, iatrogenic democide, as it will come to be known as. They will be written of as "tragically died young" due to one of the myriad of shot induced side effects that already happen to be diagnosed. Turbo cancers, prion disorders, suicides, car accidents, strokes, ad nauseam.😤😭🤐
Those that died within 56 days of receiving the shot, will be ultimately acknowledged as being "tragic victims of a terrible mistake". But that number of people, is no where near the terrible and horrifying number still to be calculated as the ultimate mortality rate.😐😐🤔😭😤😤🤦♀️
Glad I could help ; thanks for the credits (just kidding).
Thanks for doing these, we have an official inquiry coming up, the new deputy PM we voted in is on our side, but we need to get rid of the inquiry commissioners appointed by Ardern. These analysis would be helpful
Of note, yes like <20 died with covid in 2021, injection to the public started in July, ramped up to high gear from September, using a dead Polynesian man and family, had a Super Saturday event in early October, mandates 15th November, vax passport kicked in December, and healthcare workers and teachers were forced to take boosters before February. Freedom occupation and protest started in Feb and ended by govt violently in early March, where unvaxed did most of mass gathering while vaxed deaths were doing the spiking
Funny how unvaccinated were dying during the vax rollout, when covid only took less than 20, others have pointed out the vax status delays, wink wink
The lab leak hoax is another distraction, the only way to create a worldwide pandemic is to clone lots and lots of virus and spread it all over the place.
More here; https://truthaddict.substack.com/p/lab-leak-zoonotic-spillover-or-deliberate
One thing we did here for the ONS data was compare against historical mortality rates.
https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/postmodern-science-delivers-immortality
Any significant difference between the NZ dataset and the historical recorded rates is a big red flag.
Even appearing in the ONS dataset provided immortality benefit to those individuals in the dataset. Hence thousands of deaths were missing.
(you cite an old article of ours, on an old blog, attributed solely to Norman which analysed reporting delay. We switched to miscategorisation as the most likely explanation. We revealed dozens of studies worldwide that relied on this 'cheap trick'.
https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/the-very-best-of-cheap-trick
The efficacy level is a statistical illusion manufactured by deploying the cheap trick. Even a negative efficacy vaccine (that gives you covid) would not only meet but would exceed the WHO 50% threshold.
This is interesting. Thanks for doing this but admittedly I'm troubled. I'm only coming from a layman's perspective but the phrase "no significant difference" seems to explain away massive deaths from the Covid-19 vaccines. Looking at the initial graph, it seems about 45 extra people per 100,000 died in that 15 month period post 2021 - not a lot but raising it to the population vaccinated size of New Zealand (let's say 80%) of a 5 million populace or so, that yields 1,800 deaths.
Now with 45 per 100,000 being insignificant, let's apply this insignificance to the UK (again let's just say 80% vaxxed). With a population of 67 million, there's now a real problem. The problem is 24,120 extra deaths. No significant difference?
And the USA at 332 million population? We now have 119,520 deaths resulting from that small difference starting at 45 per 100,000.
If a gas explosion wiped out a small city and Joe Biden rocked up and said, don't, worry, it's not significant, we have 20,000 settlements in the US, that's only 6 people extra dying per settlement, it's not a problem, I think there would be a problem!
I'm not actually a maths guy tbh, so there's a chance I've made a dreadfully embarrassing mistake and perhaps my working is not perfect but there seems to be big trouble with this phrase from my perspective. Please tell me where I am going wrong?
Can’t wait til you finally follow my year-plus-old advice and do a U.S. County dashboard
Also global cities
Gonna be epic
As someone said to me if you are in a resthome it was probably mandatory to get the vaxx. I had a couple of looks at the NZ data myself and my analysis definitely indicated a higher death rate over 60.
Death notices in the NZ Herald (goes against the narrative of more deaths a little)
https://plebeianresistance.substack.com/p/death-notices-in-the-nz-herald-over
The NZ Mortality data
https://plebeianresistance.substack.com/p/the-nz-mortality-data
2022 mortality in NZ compared to 2010 (indicates that older people are dying from the jabs)
https://plebeianresistance.substack.com/p/2022-mortality-in-nz-compared-to
It was Chris Johnson who raised the FOI request.
Yes, the issues in curating interpolation methodology subreferencing age-stratified disaggregation interpolation v age-standardized age/vaccination datasets... ‘Tis a bother innit.
It would help if our nz min health here were honest & data not fraudulent- & then they wouldnt have to go after barry young would they.
I prefer to trust my eyeballs out here in the real world, & here in nz two boyhood mates- infinitely fitter & healthier than moi- snuffed it to rapid cancers post vax, not seeing 65. We all have many such stories.
“Covid?” Sorry mate, you’ll have to explain that one.
My family didnt get vaxed, never masked or locked down- instead cheek by jowl with tens thousands other un-jabbed freedom fighters at rallies from auckland to wellington
... & never had your “covid.”
& all those we know got vaxed get “covid” every other week. A constant talking point for them.
Add philip buckler’s 714 page ‘book on masks’ to yr reading lists. Even more refs confirming masking ails mis-diagnosed as “covid” or “long covid.”
I have read enough OIA’s to know everything coming from our govt is fake. “Data manipulation” too tame a phrase. Same issue here as poms with their ONS.
Dear Ben, thanks for your great work with numerous interesting findings. I notice that in the cumulative mortality graph, the differences increase during winter in the southern hemisphere (~ July). Because of the strong age dependence of the seasonal waves, this is most likely related to age differences in the vaccination rate. Aggregations over 10-20 year age cohorts probably do not resolve this accurately enough, because mortality is exponentially age-dependent (above 30 years of age), while vax quote is not.
You can at least partially solve this with an interpolation using the base points available from the data (I do this in my estimation of weekly life expectancies from rough age cohorts, and it works quite well).
It is possible that the difference would then disappear completely.